http://blog.hexagonstar.com/waterproof_as3_singleton/ turn-based glory and pixel pleasure Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:41:38 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://blog.hexagonstar.com/waterproof_as3_singleton/#comment-562 Danny Patterson Mon, 11 Dec 2006 04:19:57 +0000 http://blog.hexagonstar.com/waterproof-as-30-singleton/#comment-562 We're working on gathering and posting the code now. Check the site in a couple weeks. We’re working on gathering and posting the code now. Check the site in a couple weeks.

]]> http://blog.hexagonstar.com/waterproof_as3_singleton/#comment-561 sascha Sun, 10 Dec 2006 11:39:36 +0000 http://blog.hexagonstar.com/waterproof-as-30-singleton/#comment-561 Danny ... cool! One of the authors here! I guess I'm taking it too serious with the Singleton! ;) btw when will you guys upload the source codes for the book?!? Danny … cool! One of the authors here! I guess I’m taking it too serious with the Singleton! btw when will you guys upload the source codes for the book?!?

]]> http://blog.hexagonstar.com/waterproof_as3_singleton/#comment-560 Danny Patterson Tue, 05 Dec 2006 20:40:50 +0000 http://blog.hexagonstar.com/waterproof-as-30-singleton/#comment-560 Keith, is right. We left out the condition that checks for the null value simply because it doesn't throw a compiler error. But if you're cool with just having a runtime error then by all means feel free to add the condition. Keith, is right. We left out the condition that checks for the null value simply because it doesn’t throw a compiler error. But if you’re cool with just having a runtime error then by all means feel free to add the condition.

]]> http://blog.hexagonstar.com/waterproof_as3_singleton/#comment-559 Daniel R. Mon, 27 Nov 2006 15:07:34 +0000 http://blog.hexagonstar.com/waterproof-as-30-singleton/#comment-559 For some additional thoughts on the singleton pattern, I collected them <a href="http://life.neophi.com/danielr/2006/10/singleton_pattern_in_as3.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>. For some additional thoughts on the singleton pattern, I collected them here.

]]> http://blog.hexagonstar.com/waterproof_as3_singleton/#comment-558 sascha Sat, 25 Nov 2006 14:13:34 +0000 http://blog.hexagonstar.com/waterproof-as-30-singleton/#comment-558 Yes but we don't have the compile time checking so it's still better to have a runtime exception than having nothing, isn't it? Yes but we don’t have the compile time checking so it’s still better to have a runtime exception than having nothing, isn’t it?

]]> http://blog.hexagonstar.com/waterproof_as3_singleton/#comment-557 keith peters Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:58:33 +0000 http://blog.hexagonstar.com/waterproof-as-30-singleton/#comment-557 The ideal solution would throw a compiler error, not just a runtime exception. I think that's why they decided to forego checking the argument. The ideal solution would throw a compiler error, not just a runtime exception. I think that’s why they decided to forego checking the argument.

]]>